EU AI Act compliance for SaaS — without a Big-Four invoice.
Article-level technical documentation for your AI features. Risk classification, transparency notice (Art. 50), training-data summary, and audit-trail. Ready for self-declaration in 21 days. Fixed €4,990. No hourly billing.
If you're reading this, this is what you're facing
- You ship AI features but don't know if you fall under "high-risk" (Annex III) or "limited-risk" (Art. 50). The wrong classification is the difference between a footer notice and €35M fines.
- KPMG / Deloitte quoted €60-120K and a 4-month engagement. You don't have either. Meanwhile your sales team is closing EU customers asking for compliance proof.
- Your engineers can build the features. They can't write the technical documentation EU notified bodies expect — and they shouldn't be spending three weeks on it.
How we fix it
Synelo delivers AI Act technical documentation as a fixed-price productised pack. We classify each AI feature against Annex III, write the Article 50 transparency disclosures, prepare the training-data summary template that GPAI obligations require, and hand you a signed technical-documentation file your legal team can deposit. You sign your own self-declaration; we provide the engineering substance behind it.
What's in the package
How it works
- Day 1. Audit + classification. We scan your product, classify every AI feature, and produce a written risk-tier report with article references.
- Days 2–14. Documentation drafting. Senior engineer writes the Annex IV file: system description, training-data summary, monitoring plan, transparency disclosures.
- Days 15–18. UI implementation. Article 50 transparency markers wired into your product UI on a feature branch your team merges.
- Days 19–21. Handover + sign-off. Final documentation file, transparency markers in production, internal training session for your team.
Who this is for
- SaaS companies (5–50 emp) shipping AI features in EU markets
- B2B platforms with EU customer contracts requiring AI Act proof
- Founders who can't afford a Big-Four engagement
- Engineering teams that can build but not document
- Companies preparing for Aug 2026 high-risk obligations
- Anyone with GPAI Art. 53 obligations from Aug 2025
Frequently asked
Are you a Notified Body?
No. Synelo Studio is an independent technical studio. The AI Act allows providers to make a self-declaration based on technical documentation. We supply the technical documentation; you sign and deposit the self-declaration. For high-risk systems requiring third-party conformity assessment, our package gives a Notified Body everything they need to start.
When does the AI Act actually apply to me?
Article 5 prohibitions are live since February 2025. GPAI obligations (Art. 53) since August 2025. High-risk system obligations from August 2026. Most SaaS falls under Art. 50 (limited-risk transparency) which applies now if you ship to EU users, regardless of where you're based.
What if my AI feature is "minimal risk"?
Minimal-risk systems have no formal AI Act obligations beyond voluntary codes. We still document this clearly in your technical file — saying "we determined minimal risk because [reasons]" is itself a defensible artefact when a customer or auditor asks.
How is this different from buying an LLM compliance template?
Templates are generic; AI Act compliance is feature-specific. We classify YOUR features, not a hypothetical. We write disclosures wired into YOUR UI, not placeholders. We populate the training-data summary with YOUR sources, not a checklist. The output is auditable, not aspirational.
Recommended path
EU AI Act readiness pack · €9,990 · 21 days
Talk to the Architect →